Key Insights
💡 Lyssna (formerly UsabilityHub) excels in quick and straightforward user testing, but may not be the best choice for complex and large-scale studies.
🌍 Lyssna’s current demographic filters are inadequate for detailed screening, failing to effectively isolate specific customer profiles.
💸 Compared to platforms like UXtweak, Lyssna has fewer features and its user panel can be expensive, especially for targeting specific user groups.
🚀 UserTesting offers a wide range of features and rapid results, making it suitable for projects requiring quick turnaround, but concerns about tester quality have been raised.
🛠️ UXtweak presents a budget-friendly option with a comprehensive toolset, especially suitable for cost-conscious businesses. It also includes access to real users, ensuring more reliable feedback.
📊 In the comparison between UXtweak, UsabilityHub, and UserTesting, UXtweak consistently earns the highest customer ratings for factors like price-to-quality ratio, ease of use, and customer service on independent websites.
🐝 Ready to enhance your testing process? Sign up for free at UXtweak now!
UsabilityHub and UserTesting alternative – UXtweak
UXtweak offers a comprehensive user research solution, similar to UsabilityHub and UserTesting. It’s designed to assist organizations through various development phases, right from early concept to final product refinement.
The platform encompasses a range of usability testing methods as prototype testing, five-second testing, screen recordings, live interviews, remote usability studies, first-click tests, among others.
🐝 Experience UXtweak’s demos for a firsthand look at user interactions and analytics ⬇
UsabilityHub and UserTesting: Features and Capabilities
The table presents a detailed overview comparing UsabilityHub, UserTesting, and UXtweak, emphasizing the distinct features of each research platform.
Note: A feature marked with an orange check in the table signifies its availability on certain testing tools, though it might come with an extra fee or be exclusive to a more advanced subscription plan.
Features | UsabilityHub (now Lyssna) | UserTesting | UXtweak |
Website Usability Testing | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
Mobile Apps Testing | ✗ | ✓ (iOS, Android, and TestFlight, no SDK installation required) | ✓ |
Prototype Testing | ✓ | ✓ (only on the Ultimate plan, Adobe XD, InVision integrations) | ✓ (Compatible with Figma, InVision, Axure) |
Card Sorting | ✓ (Only open and closed, no hybrid) | ✓ (only available on Ultimate plan or as an add-on) | ✓ (available on all plans) |
Tree Testing | ✗ | ✓ (only on the Ultimate plan or as an add-on) | ✓ |
Preference Testing | ✓ (test images and video - no audio like UXtweak) | ✗ | ✓ |
First Click Testing | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
5 Second Testing | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ |
A/B Testing | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
Moderated/User Interviews | ✓ | ✓ (on Advanced plan and higher) | ✓ (on Enterprise plans) conduct directly in one platform* |
Session recording | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
Survey | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Website recruiting widget | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
Branching logic (conditional logic) | ✓ (on Pro plan) | ✓ | ✓ |
*UXtweak offers built in features to recruit, schedule, conduct, and analyze user interviews or any other moderated studies.
The table shows that all three platforms offer a wide range of features. Notably, UXtweak includes every feature listed, often in a more advanced form or at a more affordable price compared to the other two platforms.
UsabilityHub and UserTesting: Participant Recruitment and Management Capabilities
The table shows how UsabilityHub, UserTesting, and UXtweak find and manage people for usability studies.
Capabilities | UsabilityHub (now Lyssna) | UserTesting | UXtweak |
Price per participant | Starts at $60/15min from Lyssna panel | Starts at $39 | Starts at $10 |
Panel size - country coverage | 100+ countries | 35 countries | 130+ countries |
Advanced Targeting criteria | ✓ 35+ attributes | ✓ | ✓ (2000+ attributes) |
Automatic QA of responses | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Expert audit | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ (included with each order from User Panel) |
Ability to bring your own users | ✓ | ✓ (for a certain price) | ✓ (for free) |
Participant management solution | ✓ | ✓ (advanced plan and higher) | ✓ (available on all plans) |
UsabilityHub and UserTesting: Pricing and Plans Comparison
Selecting a platform demands thoughtful evaluation of its cost-effectiveness. You should choose one that fulfills your research needs while fitting your budget. Let’s look into the affordability of the research platforms we’ve examined.
UsabilityHub pricing options
Here’s a brief overview of UsabilityHub’s various pricing plans, designed to suit different needs and budgets:
Free Plan
- 2-min tests/surveys, 15 self-recruited responses, 5 monthly interviews, no CSV export.
Basic Plan ($900/year or $75/month, billed yearly)
- Unlimited tests/surveys/interviews, 3-10 seats (extra cost), 5-min test/survey limit, unlimited responses, 15 monthly interviews, full panel access, CSV exports.
Pro Plan ($175/month, billed annually or $2100/year)
- Includes Basic features plus unlimited test/survey duration, 5-15 seats (extra cost), 30 monthly interviews, response limit option, conditional logic, custom branding.
Enterprise Plan (Contact for pricing)
- Custom solutions, unlimited tests/surveys/interviews, unlimited seats, customizable interview sessions, full panel access, additional enterprise features.
Pricing scenarios of UsabilityHub
For Solo Researchers:
- Basic Plan: $900/year or $75/month (billed yearly). Includes 3 seats (non-optional), with a 5-minute limit on test lengths.
- Pro Plan: $175/month (billed annually, $2100/year). Comes with 5 seats, no time limits on tests.
For Teams:
- Pro Plan: $175/month (billed annually, $2100/year). Includes 5 seats, with extra charges for additional seats (up to 15). Unlimited tests in number and duration, 30 self-sourced interview sessions per month.
UserTesting pricing options
Plan Options:
- Essentials: Basic user feedback collection; excludes card sorting, tree testing, advanced demographics, sentiment analysis, live interviews.
- Advanced: Enhanced test creation, advanced reporting, mobile app testing, advanced User Panel demographics, sentiment analysis, click maps, live interviews.
- Ultimate: Includes Advanced features plus card sorting, tree testing (in English), additional targeting filters, and advanced reporting.
Customization and Scenarios:
- Contact UserTesting for tailored plans.
- Solo researchers: Essentials or Advanced.
- Research teams: Ultimate with necessary add-ons.
Cost Details:
- Annual subscriptions start at around $30,000/year.
- Typical investments are closer to $50,000/year, varying with seats and extras like User Panel credits and international team support.
💡 Did You Know…?
👉 UserTesting users on Reddit often share frustration with the platform’s high costs, even though it provides a large participant pool and quick results.
👉 UsabilityHub users highlight its affordability and speed but point out that it lacks key features like filter questions for better participant targeting.
👉 At UXtweak, you get the best of both worlds:
- Advanced participant targeting without the need for manual filters.
- Powerful analytics tools that outperform UsabilityHub.
- Much lower costs compared to UserTesting, making it accessible to teams of all sizes.
💛 Upgrade your UX research with UXtweak and save time, money, and effort!
UXtweak pricing options
UXtweak offers various pricing plans, each designed to suit different testing needs, including a no-cost option for smaller projects.
- Starter Plan: Free, includes all features, 1 active study, and 15 monthly responses.
- Basic Plan: €1,356/year (€113/month), offers 3 active studies, 50 responses/month, unlimited reports, and video exports.
- Custom Plan: Tailored for large projects with unlimited responses and custom support. Flexible pricing available.
All plans are typically billed annually, with a monthly subscription option for extra flexibility. Plans can be changed or canceled anytime. Visit UXtweak’s pricing page for detailed plan features.
UsabilityHub and UserTesting: Customer Reviews
To ensure an unbiased assessment of the three platforms discussed, we’ve incorporated a table compiled using data from capterra.com. Similar to G2, this website aggregates user reviews of various platforms.
UsabilityHub | UserTesting | UXtweak | |
Overall Score | 4.7/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.8/5 |
Ease of Use | 4.7/5 | 4.4/5 | 4.7/5 |
Customer Service | 4.8/5 | 4.3/5 | 5/5 |
Value for money | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.8/5 |
Source: capterra.com
UsabilityHub (Lyssna)
Pros:
- Responsive Customer Support: Users appreciate the helpful and responsive customer support.
- Ease of Setup: Users appreciate the platform’s user-friendly setup process.
- Resourceful Library: Lyssna’s extensive library of articles, offering tips and tricks, is a notable resource for users.
Cons:
- Cost of User Panel: Utilizing Lyssna’s own user panel can be costly, especially for targeting specific user subsets.
- Limitations in Live Site Testing: Users express a desire for the ability to test live sites, such as directing customers to competitor sites or their own current site for comparison with prototypes.
- Panel Demographic Limitation: The majority of the panel users are based in the USA, which might be limiting for global user insights.
- Insufficient Screener Questions: There’s a need for more detailed screening questions, as the current demographic filters don’t sufficiently narrow down to specific customer profiles.
- Limited Testing Formats: Absence of short, unmoderated testing options like think-aloud tasks. Users suggest that short audio recordings at the end of tests could capture valuable insights.
Source: G2.com
UserTesting
Pros:
- Valuable Video Feedback: The platform is appreciated for its video feedback feature, which provides insightful and sometimes brutally honest reviews that aid in project development.
- Rapid Panel Responses: Noted for quick feedback from its panel.
- SUS Scale Evaluation: Availability of System Usability Scale evaluation.
- Sentiment Analysis: Included in the Advanced plan and higher levels.
Cons:
- Respondent Quality Issues: Some users report low-quality respondents.
- Platform Stability: Users on Capterra mention occasional glitches during tests.
- Audience Targeting Limitations: The level of audience targeting and segmentation could be more detailed.
- Cost Factor: Generally perceived as an expensive tool.
- Mobile Testing: Comparative testing on mobile screens requires significant enhancement.
Source: G2.com
UXtweak
Pros:
- Tool Variety: A broad range of tools with advanced features, reducing the need for additional software.
- Cost-Effective: Offers friendly pricing, making it an economical option.
- Quality of Respondents: Provides access to high-quality respondents for reliable feedback.
- Questionnaire Flexibility: The platform allows for versatile design options in questionnaires.
- Audience Sourcing: Integrated within the app, this feature allows targeting specific respondents easily without needing external tools, providing quick responses.
- Responsive Customer Support: The customer support team is noted for its responsiveness and helpfulness.
Cons:
- Learning Curve: Initial familiarization with the dashboard may take some time.
- Feature Complexity: Regular addition of complex features can be challenging for users.
- UXtweak note: To address this, new tutorial videos are being produced.
Source: G2.com
UsabilityHub and UserTesting: Support options
When facing usability issues, having access to excellent support options from your selected platform is crucial. Let’s now examine the support solutions provided by each platform in this comparison.
UsabilityHub
UsabilityHub (Lyssna) provides several straightforward support channels to assist you with your needs, from customer inquiries to sales-related queries.
- Customer Support: Use chat on Lyssna dashboard for quick help, or email support@lyssna.com for other inquiries.
- Manual Purchases: For orders over $2,000 USD, email purchases@lyssna.com for invoice or payment assistance.
- Sales Inquiries: Contact the Sales team for enterprise or vendor help. Book a meeting for specialized support.
UserTesting
UserTesting offers a range of support services to meet the varying needs of its users:
- Basic Support: Accessible to all, providing 24/7 email support on weekdays (Sunday 3 pm to Friday 10 pm PT), except major holidays.
- Enhanced Support: For mid-tier plan users, adding live chat and phone support to Basic Support during the same hours.
- Premier Support: Exclusive to top-tier plan subscribers, offering 24-hour weekday support including most holidays, priority responses across all channels, one-hour email response time, and dedicated Premier Support Power Sessions for in-depth assistance.
- Additional Options: Consultations available for non-customers, and Premier Power Sessions can be scheduled from Sunday 5:30 pm to Friday 4 pm PT.
UXtweak
At UXtweak, we extend beyond traditional support options by providing consulting services and audits conducted by our in-house team of expert UX researchers. Our commitment to excellence is highlighted by our perfect 5/5 rating on Capterra. For more information, feel free to explore our UX research consulting services.
🐝 Register for free with UXtweak today!
UsabilityHub vs UserTesting: Conclusion
UsabilityHub (or Lyssna) is known for its user-friendly setup and responsive customer support, complemented by a resourceful library of helpful articles. However, it faces limitations compared to platforms like UXtweak, such as higher costs for using its predominantly U.S.-based user panel and a lack of diverse features. Additionally, its screener questions are not as refined. While Lyssna excels in quick and straightforward user testing, it may not be the ideal choice for more complex and large-scale studies.
UserTesting is known for its wide range of features and fast results, ideal for projects that need quick completion. This makes it a good choice for big companies with larger budgets, as it’s more expensive. However, there are some concerns from users about tester quality, potentially affecting the outcomes of the tests.
On the other hand, UXtweak provides an affordable solution with a comprehensive toolset, making it a practical alternative, especially in areas where Lyssna and UserTesting have higher costs. Additionally, UXtweak’s access to real users enhances feedback reliability, addressing the common quality issues found on other platforms.
